‹‹ Last Thread | Next Thread ››  35  1/2 12››

Poll Trade Reward Activity

Poll Subject: Skin or no skin  single choice [Show Voters]
No	49 (61.25%)
Yes	31 (38.75%)

twiceAweek Sex God UID 1044 Digest Posts 0 Credits 21103 Posts 20488 Karma 20529 Acceptance 11481 Reading Access 110 Registered 12-4-2007 Status Offline

#1 Post at 4-8-2008 15:41  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Skin or no skin Are you circumcized ? [ Last edited by  twiceAweek at 6-8-2008 08:01 ]

LEGION Nookie Newbie UID 12772 Digest Posts 0 Credits 85 Posts 73 Karma 85 Acceptance 2 Reading Access 10 Registered 4-7-2008 Status Offline

#2 Post at 4-8-2008 18:13  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Yes. Although, being circumcised is not the usual case in my country. I had to go circumcised because of medical issues, my foreskin was way too small so it really hurt. Now that I am, I would not want to go back. I think girls generally prefer a circumcised dick, they are way easier to clean - or to put it this way: No smegma ftw. Still having a feeling but enduring much longer during sex is a plus as well. And, as you may have heard, being circumcised actually can help reducing the risk of getting aids by, I think, 70%. Now whenever I see a not circumcised dick in some porn movie, it's going to be deleted immediately, it just doesn't look good. I'd say I am disgusted by the look of an uncircumcised dick. No offense.

parker Carnal Conqueror UID 4447 Digest Posts 0 Credits 206 Posts 142 Karma 205 Acceptance 16 Reading Access 30 Registered 15-11-2007 Status Offline

#3 Post at 5-8-2008 00:46  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L have any bros had the snip as an adult? that is, have they had sex with and without and can make an objective comparison?

wackojacko Throbbing Titan UID 8852 Digest Posts 0 Credits 4016 Posts 3165 Karma 4010 Acceptance 111 Reading Access 70 Registered 27-2-2008 Location Depends where I wake up! Status Offline

#4 Post at 5-8-2008 05:53  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #1 twiceAweek's post Twice, you have confused me with your question.  Skin or no skin?  No skin being circumcised would lead me to hit the "No" button for no skin. However in your first post you ask the question of "Are you circumcised" which would evoke an answer of YES if I was.   Please clarify - I can't be both at the same time!

Jake (The Snake: King of 141) Master Mongerer UID 2553 Digest Posts 0 Credits 5607 Posts 3938 Karma 5594 Acceptance 259 Reading Access 80 Registered 20-7-2007 Status Offline

#5 Post at 5-8-2008 09:56  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #3 parker's post Yeah, I noticed that. But the Poll Subject is 'skin or no skin'. So I've assumed a no means no skin. Live Life With Passion

Jake (The Snake: King of 141) Master Mongerer UID 2553 Digest Posts 0 Credits 5607 Posts 3938 Karma 5594 Acceptance 259 Reading Access 80 Registered 20-7-2007 Status Offline

#6 Post at 5-8-2008 10:08  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #3 parker's post I was circumcised in my mid-30s. Much better before circumcision - more sensitive - a lot more sensitive. My dickhead was protected at all times by the foreskin and only came out to play. Man. it was so pink and moist, almost virginal in its beauty and purity.    Now it's gnarled and haggard - like the rest of me. Live Life With Passion

twiceAweek Sex God UID 1044 Digest Posts 0 Credits 21103 Posts 20488 Karma 20529 Acceptance 11481 Reading Access 110 Registered 12-4-2007 Status Offline

#7 Post at 5-8-2008 10:11  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Sorry for the confusion .... The question is :   Are you circumcized ? I think I've fuked up this poll ... [ Last edited by  twiceAweek at 5-8-2008 10:15 ]

twiceAweek Sex God UID 1044 Digest Posts 0 Credits 21103 Posts 20488 Karma 20529 Acceptance 11481 Reading Access 110 Registered 12-4-2007 Status Offline

#8 Post at 5-8-2008 10:14  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #6 Jake's post Good point ! actualluy I was wondering if circumcised pricks are less sensitive ... Recent Ratings SEAJ   9-12-2010 13:59   Acceptance   +1   Thus revealing thineself! LOL!

hunter (Real Slim Slapper-Status: 九叔 .) Fucking Legend UID 2748 Digest Posts 0 Credits 16230 Posts 12435 Karma 16060 Acceptance 3408 Reading Access 100 Registered 5-8-2007 Location Pussy Paradise, Earth Status Offline

#9 Post at 5-8-2008 10:18  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #8 twiceAweek's post Twice, There was a thread discussed earlier. Some bros had experience both skin and no skin. It was interesting...... Iniitally circumcised dick will be very sensitive and after a all become less sentitive b'cos too much exposure and gettin use to it......somethin like that.....cannot remembr. Retired from pussy arena….Uncle 9

hunter (Real Slim Slapper-Status: 九叔 .) Fucking Legend UID 2748 Digest Posts 0 Credits 16230 Posts 12435 Karma 16060 Acceptance 3408 Reading Access 100 Registered 5-8-2007 Location Pussy Paradise, Earth Status Offline

#10 Post at 5-8-2008 10:22  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Old threads: The usual professors discussion..... http://forum.sex141.com/eforum/v ... ighlight=circumcise Again by Jack Daniels......so I guess now Jack need not go to Hospital for circumcision. http://forum.sex141.com/eforum/v ... ighlight=circumcise Retired from pussy arena….Uncle 9

wackojacko Throbbing Titan UID 8852 Digest Posts 0 Credits 4016 Posts 3165 Karma 4010 Acceptance 111 Reading Access 70 Registered 27-2-2008 Location Depends where I wake up! Status Offline

#11 Post at 5-8-2008 10:37  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #10 hunter's post Hunter, you are indeed a legend!  Thanks for the links.

MasterBlaster1 Lustful Lord UID 2661 Digest Posts 0 Credits 613 Posts 285 Karma 610 Acceptance 52 Reading Access 40 Registered 30-7-2007 Status Offline

#12 Post at 5-8-2008 10:52  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L QUOTE And, as you may have heard, being circumcised actually can help reducing the risk of getting aids by, I think, 70%. UNQUOTE Is it that much 70%??  I had heard about this study before, but I had no idea the risk factor is reduced by so much.

wackojacko Throbbing Titan UID 8852 Digest Posts 0 Credits 4016 Posts 3165 Karma 4010 Acceptance 111 Reading Access 70 Registered 27-2-2008 Location Depends where I wake up! Status Offline

#13 Post at 5-8-2008 11:15  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #12 MasterBlaster1's post Master, where did you get the quote from?

twiceAweek Sex God UID 1044 Digest Posts 0 Credits 21103 Posts 20488 Karma 20529 Acceptance 11481 Reading Access 110 Registered 12-4-2007 Status Offline

#14 Post at 5-8-2008 11:39  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #10 hunter's post   thanks ! MB1 - reduce the possibility of HIV/AIDS by 70% ?  I'm going to read up on this !!! I thought all transmission were through body fluids so skin or no skin wouldn't make any difference.

hunter (Real Slim Slapper-Status: 九叔 .) Fucking Legend UID 2748 Digest Posts 0 Credits 16230 Posts 12435 Karma 16060 Acceptance 3408 Reading Access 100 Registered 5-8-2007 Location Pussy Paradise, Earth Status Offline

#15 Post at 5-8-2008 11:46  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #14 twiceAweek's post I read somewhere that the lower risk (not sure that high of 70%) is because uncircumcised skin had the skin moving up and down. So when we pull out the Dom after the deed, there is a risk that some of the fluid from the gal vagina still fresh all over the lower part of the skin being move up towards the Dick head and mix up with ur semen...... Be careful when letting the gal taking off the condom for you. They use the same tissue to wipe / pull the condom off and then wipe ur dick head.....stupid!!!!! I always stop them and ask for new tissues........just watch out.....they dun care bout your dick/hygiene after you finish your dick. Best, do it yourself....   Another fact.....circumcision also reduce STD. Hit me if I am wrong....... Retired from pussy arena….Uncle 9

MasterBlaster1 Lustful Lord UID 2661 Digest Posts 0 Credits 613 Posts 285 Karma 610 Acceptance 52 Reading Access 40 Registered 30-7-2007 Status Offline

#16 Post at 5-8-2008 13:08  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #15 hunter's post Wacko, I am referring to Legion's post up there....#2 I have read that indeed men who are uncut are higher risk because the foreskin can develop micro-tears quite easily, and that the foreskin is sometimes not clean and uncut men who have ulceration on the foreskin are at very high risk for female-to-male transmission.  That's why in certain places (Africa, India, China, Thailand) where circumcision is not the norm, the female-to-male transmission rate is much higher. Maybe the report is wrong, but that's what I read...but I was surprised to see that (if its true) the risk is 70% less for circumcised men. [ Last edited by  MasterBlaster1 at 5-8-2008 13:16 ]

wackojacko Throbbing Titan UID 8852 Digest Posts 0 Credits 4016 Posts 3165 Karma 4010 Acceptance 111 Reading Access 70 Registered 27-2-2008 Location Depends where I wake up! Status Offline

#17 Post at 5-8-2008 13:29  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #16 MasterBlaster1's post 70% is a huge statistic.  I'm with twice regarding the transmission of the virus.  I thought that its transmission was through exchange of fluids or through open wounds / cuts.  I would like to know where the figure of 70% comes from.

MasterBlaster1 Lustful Lord UID 2661 Digest Posts 0 Credits 613 Posts 285 Karma 610 Acceptance 52 Reading Access 40 Registered 30-7-2007 Status Offline

#18 Post at 5-8-2008 14:27  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #17 wackojacko's post http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm Interesting article about it here.  The average % of reduced risk, according to the 3 studies conducted in Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda, is 63%.

wackojacko Throbbing Titan UID 8852 Digest Posts 0 Credits 4016 Posts 3165 Karma 4010 Acceptance 111 Reading Access 70 Registered 27-2-2008 Location Depends where I wake up! Status Offline

#19 Post at 5-8-2008 14:32  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #18 MasterBlaster1's post Thanks for the link and the info.  Interesting results - I guess even less chance of transmission when a party hat is used - then it doesn't matter if you are circumcised or not!

LEGION Nookie Newbie UID 12772 Digest Posts 0 Credits 85 Posts 73 Karma 85 Acceptance 2 Reading Access 10 Registered 4-7-2008 Status Offline

#20 Post at 5-8-2008 14:55  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Yep, sorry I didn't provide a source for my claim. However, seeing that it's around 63%, hey, that's almost 70 isn't it. And for the reasons: The foreskin tends to have little wounds when engaging in sex and through those wounds you can get infected. Cutting the foreskin results in a smaller chance to actually get it.

35  1/2 12››

Poll Trade Reward Activity

All times are GMT+8, the time now is 6-5-2024 19:06

Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. ZH141.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, ZH141.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. ZH141.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. ZH141.COM reserves all the legal rights.