‹‹ Last Thread | Next Thread ››

Poll Trade Reward Activity

Caligynephiliac Erotic Emperor UID 14102 Digest Posts 0 Credits 2160 Posts 937 Karma 2122 Acceptance 755 Reading Access 60 Registered 29-8-2008 Location Hong Kong Status Offline

#1 Post at 29-7-2009 21:40  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Smiley inflation? What's with the recent proliferation of smileys?  Is there progress in substituting a 1-10 scale for meaningless smileys, rather than the 1-5 scale?  I'm sure glad that the owners of the 141 site are focussing their scarce resources on making changes valuable to us mongers...   Have fun, CGP

sexpert Erotic Emperor UID 6099 Digest Posts 0 Credits 2144 Posts 1895 Karma 2117 Acceptance 545 Reading Access 60 Registered 20-12-2007 Location NYC and Mong Kok Status Offline

#2 Post at 30-7-2009 06:50  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #1 Caligynephiliac's post Yeah, I'm not really buying it because it really takes a while to count them.  Dizzying if you ask me.

calaisien Erotic Emperor UID 15584 Digest Posts 0 Credits 2709 Posts 637 Karma 2690 Acceptance 387 Reading Access 60 Registered 3-11-2008 Status Offline

#3 Post at 30-7-2009 11:36  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #2 sexpert's post yeah I notice the change yesterday and I'm agree with, it's not convenient to count all the smiley. definetly easier with a scale out of 5

twiceAweek Sex God UID 1044 Digest Posts 0 Credits 21106 Posts 20491 Karma 20532 Acceptance 11489 Reading Access 110 Registered 12-4-2007 Status Offline

#4 Post at 30-7-2009 15:20  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L I just noticed the rating is different for different girls ... some gets 10 smilies for service some gets lesss for skill etc ... wonder if this be that the admin is actually trying to give a better assessment of the girls ?

hunter (Real Slim Slapper-Status: 九叔 .) Fucking Legend UID 2748 Digest Posts 0 Credits 16230 Posts 12435 Karma 16060 Acceptance 3408 Reading Access 100 Registered 5-8-2007 Location Pussy Paradise, Earth Status Offline

#5 Post at 30-7-2009 15:39  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #4 twiceAweek's post But none get less than 5. This is all just an ad. All bros, you guys really want to trust the ad rating?? The gals/agents pay for the ad fee to put up their / gals photos and don;t think they wanna put 1/10 or 5/10. Ridiculous if they do that....... Retired from pussy arena….Uncle 9

Anthony Nookie Newbie UID 16324 Digest Posts 0 Credits 70 Posts 44 Karma 70 Acceptance 2 Reading Access 10 Registered 26-11-2008 Location Hong Kong Status Offline

#6 Post at 30-7-2009 15:45  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L At first sight, looks like nothing has changed, rating is still inconsistent like before!    And those flat standard comments "hot embossment body", "deadly in temptation", "terrific shape of body", etc unfortunately are still there!    I wish there could be a system where users vote for the girls!?

mxq (Massagee Talent Scout) Kinky King UID 14982 Digest Posts 0 Credits 1397 Posts 747 Karma 1381 Acceptance 326 Reading Access 50 Registered 8-10-2008 Status Offline

#7 Post at 30-7-2009 15:53  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L I wonder if they get charged by the smilie? Seems like a good way for the site to double its earnings on the ratings part

twiceAweek Sex God UID 1044 Digest Posts 0 Credits 21106 Posts 20491 Karma 20532 Acceptance 11489 Reading Access 110 Registered 12-4-2007 Status Offline

#8 Post at 30-7-2009 16:19  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L I need to elaborate what I just said .... look at these girls in the DB : http://www.sex141.com/en/viewid.php?uid=26621&weekly=1 http://www.sex141.com/en/viewid.php?uid=28176&weekly=1 http://www.sex141.com/en/viewid.php?uid=5362&weekly=1 http://www.sex141.com/en/viewid.php?uid=124&weekly=1 http://www.sex141.com/en/viewid.php?uid=31845&weekly=1 what I'm trying to say is that at least they're starting to mix it up a little ! I'm not saying to believe in it ... just that they are putting a bit more effort in trying to make it more believeable ! [ Last edited by  twiceAweek at 30-7-2009 16:31 ]

mxq (Massagee Talent Scout) Kinky King UID 14982 Digest Posts 0 Credits 1397 Posts 747 Karma 1381 Acceptance 326 Reading Access 50 Registered 8-10-2008 Status Offline

#9 Post at 30-7-2009 18:49  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #8 twiceAweek's post The weird thing is, as much as I would not be persuaded by seeing a WG get 10 smilies in a particular category, because just as Hunter says, it's just an ad, not to be believed, I do think I would be deterred from seeing a girl that only gets 4 smilies in a category, like the Suki @ 66 Parkes St does for service in your second link.   That might not make a whole lot of sense, but that's how it is for me.

homer168 Kinky King UID 3969 Digest Posts 0 Credits 1628 Posts 612 Karma 1611 Acceptance 341 Reading Access 50 Registered 25-10-2007 Location Fragrant Harbour Status Offline

#10 Post at 30-7-2009 20:30  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Reply #6 Anthony's post your "system" for rating is right here - visit a girl - write a report to share with the fellow board members. I have found some Gem's thanks to others recommendations. I would not expect 141 or any other site to directly allow ratings on the girls page..

nycazn Musky Member UID 2104 Digest Posts 0 Credits 164 Posts 142 Karma 164 Acceptance 1 Reading Access 20 Registered 29-6-2007 Status Offline

#11 Post at 30-7-2009 21:40  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L looking at twice post of 141 girls it seems like they want to add another category for rating. there is an extra colon between outlook and body. i wonder what do they want to add?

polomint Erotic Emperor UID 5414 Digest Posts 0 Credits 2220 Posts 281 Karma 2211 Acceptance 175 Reading Access 60 Registered 1-12-2007 Status Offline

#12 Post at 31-7-2009 05:59  Profile P.M.  Font size: S M L Owners are probably trying to give a more accurate report but instead of smileys a 6/10 or 10/10 would be better.  Makes me dizzy counting

Poll Trade Reward Activity

All times are GMT+8, the time now is 14-5-2024 17:06

Disclaimer: This forum is operated as a real-time bulletin board system. ZH141.COM carries no legal liability on its contents. All messages are solely composed and up-loaded by readers and their opinions do not represent our stand. Readers are reminded that the contents on this forum may not convey reliable information thus it is readers' own responsibility to judge the validity, completeness and truthfulness of the messages. For messages related to medical, legal or investment issues, readers should always seek advice from professionals. Due to the limitation of the forum's real-time up-loading nature, ZH141.com is not able to monitor all the messages posted. Should readers find any problems regarding the messages, do contact us. ZH141.COM reserves the rights to delete or preserve any messages and reject anyone from joining this forum. ZH141.COM reserves all the legal rights.