HIV - Is DATY 100% Safe?
I don’t think that any reputable doctor will categorically state that any kind of oral sex is 100% safe. But anyone can search the internet and find a website that will support whatever views they might have. But on a sex forum such as 141, I think it’s highly irresponsible that a senior member continues to extol the virtues of DATY. Not only does he tell us that any risk is so negligible that it can be safely ignored but he also tells us that it’s the best or only way to pleasure a woman and even that you’re not a ‘real man’ unless you do DATY. Even worse, he ridicules those who have different views. When one bro recently wrote that he didn’t do DATY with WGs, this senior member scathingly replied:
“If your girl friend or wife would like to experience, at least once in her deprived life, what's it like to be properly fucked, send her around.”
Now, if you said that to somebody’s face a fight would erupt, but this senior bro gets away with it because this is an anonymous forum.
I wrote a post stating that, for men, DATY was more dangerous than BBBJ, which is pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain. I just googled ‘HIV Oral Sex’ and this is the first site that comes up:
http://aids.about.com/cs/safesex/a/oralsex.htm
Quote:
Oral-Penile Contact (fellatio)
Theoretical Risk: With fellatio, there is a theoretical risk of transmission for the receptive partner because infected pre-ejaculate ("pre-cum") fluid or semen can get into the mouth. For the insertive partner there is a theoretical risk of infection because infected blood from a partner's bleeding gums or an open sore could come in contact with a scratch, cut, or sore on the penis.
Documented Risk: Although the risk is many times less than anal or vaginal sex, HIV has been transmitted to receptive partners through fellatio, even in cases when insertive partners didn't ejaculate.
Oral-Vaginal Contact (cunnilingus)
Theoretical Risk: Cunnilingus carries a theoretical risk of HIV transmission for the insertive partner (the person who is licking or sucking the vaginal area) because infected vaginal fluids and blood can get into the mouth. (This includes, but is not limited to, menstrual blood). Likewise, there is a theoretical risk of HIV transmission during cunnilingus for the receptive partner (the person who is having her vagina licked or sucked) if infected blood from oral sores or bleeding gums comes in contact with vulvar or vaginal cuts or sores.
Documented Risk: The risk of HIV transmission during cunnilingus is extremely low compared to vaginal and anal sex. However, there have been a few cases of HIV transmission most likely resulting from oral-vaginal sex.
End Quote
The one doing the sucking from the partners’ sex organ is the one most at risk – girl in BBBJ and guy in DATY - surely that’s obvious. You all know that sticking you dick into an HIV-infected pussy is dangerous. Why would anyone think it’s perfectly safe to stick your tongue in there and to swallow her HIV- infected pussy juice – THINK ABOUT IT.
And, in return for my warning and advice, what did I get – well, I received 20 Negative Acceptance points. So what’s going on? Not only is this senior bro actively encouraging an unsafe sexual practice, he’s deliberately trying to stifle any views to the contrary. This guy is old and has no family so I suppose, for him, the risks are acceptable. But what about the young guys here – those will someday get married and have children – the risks, surely, are not the same.
I agree that we’re all adults here and we’re all free to make our own choices but, as I said, I think it’s highly irresponsible that DATY is being actively promoted as not only being 100% safe, but as being highly desirable.
If you’ve read this far; thank you. I know that this senior bro will come back with websites and statistics to ‘prove’ his opinion but all I say is – use your own brain and think about it. If it’s not safe for your dick in there, why is it safe for your tongue and why is it safe to swallow HIV-infected pussy juice? | |
