Perhaps a practical way to filter photos/videos?
Hi ch0wd0wn, I’ll only comment on the variability of photos/videos across Hotel Walk-Ins versus Walk-Ups. No experience with Spas/Phone Appointments.
With Hotel Walk-Ins/Honey girls, photos+video can be 100% authentic ... yet, many pimps Bait&Switch ... deliberately using outdated info to get unsuspecting punters to turn up at their hotels ... tempting them with alternative offers once on site.
With Walk-Ups, photos are likely an 80:20 rule ... out of 10 girls, 8 photoshop ... additionally, ladies aged mid 30s upwards tend to recycle backdated (much younger) photos. On a practical note ...
1. Profiles that have photos with a pink/red tint in their “My album”/“Fan’s comment” sections, especially within the setting of her room ... more accurately depicts her body dimensions versus studio photos with clear lighting.
2. Much fewer Walk-Ups with videos (than Hotel girls). Comparing a video against pink/red tinted pics is about as “reliable” a WYSIWYG gauge of her body ratios. Even in videos, plenty of apps to mask faces. Harder to alter limbs/torso/legs in videos.
3. No pink/red tinted pics &/or video? I’d pass on such a random pick & revisit candidates with 1, 2.
Just plan forward the logistics. About 75% of girls with videos are in TST, less so in MK/SSP. If u are shortlisting hotel girls based on their videos, as a back up, identify Walk-Ups that have pink/red tinted pics and/or videos in the same locations. No pimp/gangster will threaten yr choice to reject the girl/walk away.
Understand u are working towards an RA of 30 to view real photos in reports. Till then, unfortunately, there isn’t a more precise online method to verify the visuals prior to a visit. | |
